TodayLegal News

State Court

State court decisions and legal developments across all 50 states and territories. Coverage spans state supreme courts, appellate courts, and significant trial court rulings on family law, property, criminal justice, and more.

State Court
4 min read
Supreme Court of Minnesota

Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Lease Defense Doctrine in COVID Case

The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed a lower court ruling in favor of landlord City Center Ventures, LLC against tenant Fitness International, LLC, establishing that the temporary frustration of purpose doctrine can suspend but not discharge commercial lease obligations. The decision provides important guidance on tenant defenses during business disruptions.

Minnesota Supreme Court recognized temporary frustration of purpose doctrine as valid under state contract law
Court ruled tenant lease obligations are suspended, not discharged, during periods of temporary frustration
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
4 min read
Supreme Court of Minnesota

Minnesota Supreme Court Reverses City Council Recall Election

The Minnesota Supreme Court reversed a Columbia Heights city council recall election, ruling that the petition against Kay "KT" Jacobs failed to meet constitutional requirements for alleging malfeasance or nonfeasance.

Minnesota Supreme Court reversed recall election for lacking required constitutional allegations
Recall petitions must specifically allege malfeasance or nonfeasance under state law
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
4 min read
Supreme Court of Minnesota

Minnesota Supreme Court Affirms Conviction in Road Rage Murder Case

The Minnesota Supreme Court rejected multiple appellate claims in State of Minnesota v. Jamal L. Smith, affirming the defendant's conviction for the fatal shooting of Jay Boughton in a road rage incident. The court found no evidence of judicial bias, ineffective counsel, or improper jury composition.

Court found no evidence of judicial bias by the district court judge
Defense counsel's failure to move for venue change did not constitute ineffective assistance
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
4 min read
Supreme Court of Minnesota

Minnesota Supreme Court Affirms Unjust Enrichment in Cohabitation Case

The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed a district court ruling that a property owner would be unjustly enriched if allowed to retain a cabin and furnishings paid for by her former unmarried partner. The July 2024 decision in Hepfl v. Meadowcroft addresses property rights when cohabitating couples separate.

Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed district court's unjust enrichment finding in property dispute between former unmarried partners
Case involved cabin and fixtures paid for by one partner during cohabitation on property owned by the other
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
4 min read
Supreme Court of Minnesota

Minnesota Supreme Court Rules State Patrol Can Be Sued Under Dog-Bite Law

The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that the state's dog-bite statute clearly waives sovereign immunity, allowing Christina Berrier to proceed with her lawsuit against the Minnesota State Patrol after a canine attack.

Minnesota Supreme Court ruled the state's dog-bite statute waives sovereign immunity for government agencies
Decision allows Christina Berrier's lawsuit against State Patrol to proceed after canine attack
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
4 min read
Supreme Court of Minnesota

Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Sexual Contact Law on Object Use

The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed a conviction for second-degree criminal sexual conduct, ruling that state law prohibits using objects to make contact with intimate parts. The July 17, 2024 decision in *Sean Michael Wocelka v. State of Minnesota* provides crucial precedent for interpreting Minnesota's criminal sexual conduct statutes.

Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed conviction for second-degree criminal sexual conduct
Court ruled that using objects to make intimate contact violates state criminal sexual conduct law
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
2 min read
Supreme Court of Missouri

Missouri Supreme Court Disbarred Attorney for Trust Fund Violations

The Missouri Supreme Court disbarred attorney James T. Crump on May 14, 2024, for multiple violations of professional conduct rules involving mismanagement of client trust funds and his IOLTA account. The court rejected lesser sanctions, ordering the most severe disciplinary action available.

Missouri Supreme Court disbarred James T. Crump for violating nine professional conduct rules
Violations involved mismanagement of client trust funds and IOLTA account operations
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
4 min read
Supreme Court of Missouri

Missouri Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Medical Marijuana License

The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the denial of a medical marijuana cultivation license to MO CANN Do, Inc., ruling that the company's application failed to meet minimum licensing requirements. The company's application included a certificate of incorporation instead of the required certificate of good standing.

Missouri Supreme Court affirmed denial of medical marijuana cultivation license to MO CANN Do, Inc.
Company failed to provide required certificate of good standing, submitting certificate of incorporation instead
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
5 min read
Supreme Court of Missouri

Missouri Supreme Court Rules for St. Louis County Assessor in Tax Case

The Missouri Supreme Court ruled in favor of St. Louis County Assessor Jake Zimmerman, reversing a circuit court decision and reinstating the State Tax Commission's denial of discrimination claims filed by 2,625 commercial property owners who alleged unfair assessments.

Missouri Supreme Court reversed circuit court and reinstated State Tax Commission's denial of discrimination claims by 2,625 commercial property owners
Property owners alleged ratio discrimination in 2017 assessments but did not claim intentional bias
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
4 min read
Supreme Court of Missouri

Missouri Supreme Court Revives Racial Discrimination Claims Against Harley-Davidson

The Missouri Supreme Court reversed a circuit court's dismissal of racial discrimination and hostile work environment claims against Harley-Davidson Motor Company and logistics partner Syncreon. The high court ruled that workers' allegations establish valid claims under the Missouri Human Rights Act.

Missouri Supreme Court vacated circuit court's dismissal of discrimination claims against Harley-Davidson and Syncreon
Case involves allegations of hostile work environment and aiding/abetting racial discrimination under Missouri Human Rights Act
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →