TodayLegal News

Missouri Supreme Court Disbarred Attorney for Trust Fund Violations

The Missouri Supreme Court disbarred attorney James T. Crump on May 14, 2024, for multiple violations of professional conduct rules involving mismanagement of client trust funds and his IOLTA account. The court rejected lesser sanctions, ordering the most severe disciplinary action available.

AI-generated Summary
2 min readcourtlistener
Seal of the Supreme Court of Missouri

Case Information

Case No.:
SC100343
Judges:
Judge Kelly C. Broniec

Key Takeaways

  • Missouri Supreme Court disbarred James T. Crump for violating nine professional conduct rules
  • Violations involved mismanagement of client trust funds and IOLTA account operations
  • Court rejected lesser sanctions, choosing disbarment over three-year suspension or probation
  • Crump served as successor trustee for two client trusts and had business dealings with clients
  • The attorney had no prior disciplinary history before these violations

The Missouri Supreme Court disbarred attorney James T. Crump in a disciplinary proceeding that concluded with the court's harshest sanction for professional misconduct involving client trust funds and ethical violations.

In *In re: James T. Crump* (Mo. 2024), the court issued its opinion on May 14, 2024, finding that Crump violated nine separate Rules of Professional Conduct. The violations stemmed from his mismanagement of two client trusts and his Interest on Lawyers Trust Account (IOLTA).

The Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel initiated the disciplinary action against Crump, seeking sanctions for his conduct related to trust account management. Following an evidentiary hearing, a disciplinary hearing panel recommended that Crump be suspended without leave to apply for reinstatement for three years. However, both parties rejected this recommendation.

Crump requested that the Missouri Supreme Court impose a stayed suspension with a period of probation, while the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel recommended the more severe sanction of disbarment. The court ultimately sided with the disciplinary counsel, determining that disbarment was the appropriate penalty given the severity and scope of the violations.

The specific violations included improper handling of client trust funds, failure to maintain adequate records of trust account transactions, and breaches of fiduciary duties while serving as successor trustee for client trusts. The court noted that these violations undermined the integrity of the legal profession and warranted the most severe disciplinary measure.

This case highlights the Missouri Supreme Court's commitment to maintaining professional standards and protecting clients from attorney misconduct involving trust funds and fiduciary responsibilities.

Topics

Attorney DisciplineProfessional MisconductTrust ManagementIOLTA ViolationsConflict of InterestDisbarment

Original Source: courtlistener

This AI-generated summary is based on publicly available legal news, court documents, legislation, regulatory filings, and legal developments. For informational purposes only; not legal advice. Read full disclosure →