State CourtDec 19, 2025•4 min readSupreme Court of VermontVermont Supreme Court Reverses Child Sex Abuse Conviction Over Testimony RulesThe Vermont Supreme Court reversed Anna Sylvester's conviction for lewd conduct with a child, ruling that allowing the six-year-old complainant to testify outside the defendant's presence violated constitutional confrontation rights.•Vermont Supreme Court reversed Anna Sylvester's conviction for lewd conduct with a child•Court ruled that allowing six-year-old complainant to testify outside defendant's presence violated Sixth Amendment confrontation rightsAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtDec 19, 2025•4 min readSupreme Court of New JerseyNJ Appeals Court Upholds 42-Year Sentence in Casino Sexual Assault CaseThe New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed the convictions of Jamel Carlton for aggravated sexual assault, burglary, and other charges against an Atlantic City casino-hotel housekeeper. The court upheld a 42-year prison sentence after rejecting Carlton's appeal challenging his Confrontation Clause rights.•New Jersey appeals court affirmed 42-year sentence for Jamel Carlton in casino sexual assault case•DNA evidence and surveillance video supported victim's testimony about violent encounterAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtDec 19, 2025•4 min readTexas Supreme CourtTexas Supreme Court Sets Appraiser Impartiality Standards in Real Estate CaseThe Supreme Court of Texas ruled that communications about hiring decisions with neutral appraisers in real estate disputes must be disclosed to all parties. The unanimous decision in Burke v. Houston PT BAC Office Limited Partnership establishes new transparency requirements for commercial lease valuation disputes.•Supreme Court of Texas requires disclosure of communications with neutral appraisers about hiring decisions to all parties•Court applied arbitration law impartiality principles to real estate appraisal dispute resolution processesAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtDec 19, 2025•4 min readFlorida Supreme CourtFlorida Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in 2005 Burial MurdersThe Florida Supreme Court issued a corrected opinion in the case of Michael James Jackson, who was convicted of robbing, kidnapping, and murdering an elderly couple by burying them alive in 2005. Jackson's death sentences were vacated in 2017 but the case has continued through appeals under changing Florida capital punishment laws.•Jackson and three codefendants murdered James and Carol Sumner by burying them alive in 2005•Original death sentences vacated in 2017 due to Hurst v. State requiring unanimous jury recommendationsAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtDec 19, 2025•2 min readCourt of Appeals of MarylandMaryland Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in State Farm Auto Case, Vacates JudgmentThe Maryland Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari on December 19, 2025, in *Bowler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company*, vacating the lower court judgment and remanding the case with reference to its recent Bowens decision, marking a significant development in the auto insurance dispute from Prince George's County Circuit Court.•Maryland Supreme Court granted petition for writ of certiorari in Bowler v. State Farm case on December 19, 2025•Court vacated the lower court judgment and remanded case to Prince George's County Circuit CourtAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtDec 19, 2025•4 min readNebraska Supreme CourtNebraska Supreme Court Clarifies Appellate Jurisdiction in Insurance CaseThe Nebraska Supreme Court issued a decision December 19, 2025, in Continental Indemnity Company v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Co., establishing important precedent on appellate jurisdiction requirements for insurance disputes between out-of-state corporations.•Nebraska Supreme Court establishes that appellate jurisdiction questions are matters of law in insurance disputes•Court clarifies requirements for final judgments, mandating single signed documents addressing all reliefAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtDec 19, 2025•4 min readNebraska Supreme CourtNebraska Supreme Court Sets Standards for Ineffective Counsel ClaimsThe Nebraska Supreme Court issued a decision in State v. Keadle on December 19, 2025, clarifying appellate review standards for ineffective assistance of counsel claims in criminal cases. The court applied the established Strickland v. Washington framework while addressing procedural questions about how appeals courts should evaluate attorney performance.•Nebraska Supreme Court clarifies that ineffective counsel claims involve mixed questions of law and fact requiring different review standards•Court applies clear error review to factual findings but independent review to legal determinations under Strickland testAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtDec 19, 2025•4 min readNebraska Supreme CourtNebraska Supreme Court Clarifies Evidence Standards in State v. LoganThe Nebraska Supreme Court issued an opinion in State v. Logan on December 19, 2025, establishing clearer standards for when trial courts abuse their discretion in evidentiary rulings. The decision provides guidance on admitting evidence of defendants' other crimes or bad acts under Nebraska Evidence Rule 404(2).•Nebraska Supreme Court establishes that appellate courts review bad acts evidence rulings for abuse of discretion under Evidence Rule 404(2)•Court defines abuse of discretion as decisions based on 'untenable or unreasonable' reasons or actions 'clearly against justice or conscience'AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtDec 19, 2025•4 min readNebraska Supreme CourtNebraska Supreme Court Clarifies Plain Error Standard in State v. MolinaThe Nebraska Supreme Court issued an opinion December 19, 2025, in State v. Cristian E. Gonzalez Molina establishing clear standards for when appellate courts may address unpreserved errors. The ruling emphasizes protecting judicial integrity while limiting plain error review to cases involving substantial rights and potential miscarriages of justice.•Court established that plain error requires unasserted trial errors that are plainly evident, prejudice substantial rights, and threaten judicial integrity•Appellate courts retain discretion in plain error review but are not constrained by specific brief arguments or required to review every possible errorAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtDec 19, 2025•4 min readSupreme Court of GuamGuam High Court Rules in Complex Family Trust DisputeThe Supreme Court of Guam issued an opinion in a long-running family business dispute involving multiple trusts, foundations, and business entities connected to the Hemlani family. The case stems from derivative claims filed on behalf of the Radhi Puran Trust against numerous defendants including family members and related businesses.•Supreme Court of Guam issued ruling in decade-long family trust litigation involving Hemlani family business interests•Case involved derivative claims on behalf of Radhi Puran Trust against multiple family members and business entitiesAI-generated SummaryRead Article →