TodayLegal News

Sentencing

Legal news related to Sentencing

84 articles

State Court
4 min read
Idaho Supreme Court

Idaho Supreme Court Affirms Life Sentences in Child Sexual Abuse Case

The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and life sentences of Todd Marshall Frandsen, who was found guilty in 2023 of two counts of lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen. The court issued an amended opinion on January 7, 2026, upholding the district court's judgment and rejecting Frandsen's appeal.

Frandsen received two concurrent life sentences with 20-year fixed terms following his 2023 conviction
The Idaho Supreme Court rejected four main arguments raised in Frandsen's appeal
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

11th Circuit Vacates Sentence in $2M Credit Card Fraud Case

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit vacated the sentence of Abdoulaye Barry, who was convicted in a sophisticated credit card fraud scheme that netted over $2 million in cigarette purchases from Sam's Club. The appeals court ruled that the district court erred by holding Barry accountable for the full amount charged by all co-conspirators without first determining his individual responsibility.

Eleventh Circuit vacated Barry's sentence for legal error in accountability determination
Fraud scheme used stolen credit cards and shared Sam's Club memberships to buy $2M in cigarettes
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
4 min read
Wyoming Supreme Court

Wyoming Supreme Court Affirms 120-Year Sentence for Child Sex Abuse

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a district court's decision to impose eight consecutive prison sentences totaling up to 120 years for Kyle Xavier Wallentine, who pleaded no contest to sexual abuse of a minor charges. The court rejected his pro se appeal after appointed counsel withdrew under the Anders procedure.

Kyle Xavier Wallentine received eight consecutive sentences of 8-15 years each for sexual abuse of a minor, totaling up to 120 years in prison
His court-appointed appellate counsel withdrew under the Anders v. California procedure, indicating no meritorious grounds for appeal
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

11th Circuit Affirms 228-Month Sentence for Armed Robbery Conspiracy

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the 228-month federal prison sentence for Avery Fuller, who pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery and aiding and abetting the brandishing of a firearm during a crime of violence. The appeals court rejected Fuller's challenge to his sentence in a per curiam opinion issued January 6, 2026.

Eleventh Circuit affirmed 228-month federal sentence for Avery Fuller on armed robbery conspiracy charges
Fuller pleaded guilty to Hobbs Act robbery conspiracy and aiding firearms brandishing during violent crime
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

8th Circuit Upholds 32-Year Sentence for Iowa Drug Trafficking Case

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals denied relief to Stephan Rashad Haley, who was sentenced to 384 months in prison after pleading guilty to drug trafficking, fraud, and money laundering charges in two consolidated federal cases.

Stephan Haley received 384 months (32 years) in federal prison for drug, fraud, and money laundering offenses
The Eighth Circuit affirmed the sentence, rejecting challenges to a drug premises enhancement
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
4 min read
Georgia Supreme Court

Georgia Supreme Court Upholds Life Sentence in Sellers Murder Case

The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the murder conviction of Christopher Sellers, who was sentenced to life without parole for the 2019 shooting death of Thedarious Mitchell in DeKalb County. The court rejected Sellers' arguments challenging the sufficiency of evidence and jury instructions.

Christopher Sellers' life sentence without parole affirmed for 2019 murder of Thedarious Mitchell
Georgia Supreme Court rejected challenges to evidence sufficiency and jury instructions
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
5 min read
Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

10th Circuit Rules on Allocution Rights in Supervised Release Cases

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a ruling in United States v. Miller addressing whether district courts must personally invite defendants to speak during supervised release revocation hearings. The case arose after Dominic Miller was sentenced to 24 months imprisonment for supervised release violations without being given the opportunity to allocute before the court.

Tenth Circuit addressed whether district courts must personally invite defendants to speak during supervised release revocation hearings
Dominic Miller was sentenced to 24 months imprisonment without being personally invited to allocute before the court
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
2 min read
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

6th Circuit Upholds 37-Year Sentence for Armed Robbery Convictions

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a 446-month prison sentence for David Johnson, who was convicted on nine federal counts including armed robbery and firearm violations. The January 2026 decision upholds convictions stemming from multiple robberies affecting interstate commerce in Ohio.

David Johnson received 446-month federal prison sentence for armed robbery and firearm violations
Sixth Circuit affirmed convictions on nine counts including robbery affecting commerce and firearm charges
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
4 min read
Nebraska Supreme Court

Nebraska Supreme Court Reaffirms Trial Judge Discretion in Sentencing

The Nebraska Supreme Court ruled Thursday in *State v. Rejai* that appellate courts cannot disturb criminal sentences within statutory limits absent an abuse of discretion by trial judges. The decision reinforces established standards for reviewing allegedly excessive sentences on appeal.

Nebraska Supreme Court ruled appellate courts cannot disturb sentences within statutory limits absent abuse of discretion
Court defined abuse of discretion as decisions based on untenable reasoning or actions clearly against justice
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
4 min read
Nebraska Supreme Court

Nebraska Supreme Court Clarifies Sentencing Discretion Standards

The Nebraska Supreme Court issued a ruling in State v. Jackson on January 2, 2026, establishing important precedent regarding trial court discretion in probationary matters and sentencing appeals. The decision clarifies when statutory language creates discretionary versus mandatory authority and sets standards for identifying abuse of discretion.

Court establishes that statutory use of 'may' creates presumption of discretionary rather than mandatory action
Trial courts retain broad discretion over probationary matters with limited appellate review
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →