State CourtJan 23, 2026•4 min readIllinois Supreme CourtIllinois Supreme Court Affirms Medical Malpractice Defense VerdictThe Illinois Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a defense verdict in a medical malpractice case against Quincy Medical Group, rejecting plaintiff Robert Schilling's arguments that the trial court should have declared a mistrial after receiving a note from a juror.•Illinois Supreme Court unanimously affirmed defense verdict in medical malpractice case against Quincy Medical Group•Plaintiff challenged trial court's response to juror note and jury polling proceduresAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtJan 23, 2026•4 min readCourt of Appeals of MarylandMaryland Supreme Court Reinstates Attorney Brendan O'Brien to State BarThe Maryland Supreme Court has reinstated attorney Brendan Michael O'Brien to the state bar, granting his petition for reinstatement on Jan. 23, 2026. The court's order allows O'Brien to resume practicing law in Maryland after a period of suspension or disbarment.•Maryland Supreme Court granted Brendan O'Brien's petition for bar reinstatement on Jan. 23, 2026•Chief Justice Matthew J. Fader signed the order allowing O'Brien to resume practicing lawAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtJan 23, 2026•4 min readSupreme Court of VermontVermont Supreme Court Reverses Property Ruling in Family Deed DisputeThe Vermont Supreme Court reversed a trial court decision in a complex family property dispute, ruling that a 1958 deed created a tenancy in common rather than a joint tenancy with right of survivorship. The case involved extended family members fighting over ownership interests in lakeside property.•Vermont Supreme Court reversed trial court ruling that awarded plaintiffs 5/6 interest in family lakeside property•Court held that 1958 deed created tenancy in common, not joint tenancy with right of survivorshipAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtJan 23, 2026•4 min readNebraska Supreme CourtNebraska Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Ineffective Counsel ClaimsThe Nebraska Supreme Court issued an opinion in *State v. Wilson* on January 23, 2026, establishing legal standards for when appellate courts can determine ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct appeal. The ruling clarifies how courts must evaluate whether trial counsel's performance met constitutional requirements.•Nebraska Supreme Court held that determining ineffective counsel claims on direct appeal is a question of law•Appellate courts must assess whether trial record contains sufficient undisputed facts for conclusive determinationAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtJan 23, 2026•2 min readCourt of Appeals of MarylandMaryland Supreme Court Dismisses Certiorari Petition in Attorney Fee DisputeThe Supreme Court of Maryland dismissed a writ of certiorari on January 23, 2026, in the case of Joseph Basso v. Jose Rodriguez, et al., by majority decision. The dismissal was procedural, resulting from the petitioner's failure to timely file briefs in a case involving attorney's fees under Maryland Rule 1-341 and contingency fee agreements.•Writ of certiorari dismissed by majority decision of Maryland's highest court•Case involved attorney's fees dispute under Maryland Rule 1-341 and contingency fee agreementsAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtJan 23, 2026•4 min readAlaska Supreme CourtAlaska Supreme Court Rules on Attorney Fee Dispute in Native Allotment CaseThe Alaska Supreme Court issued a decision on January 23, 2026, in Leroy Oenga, Jr. v. Maria M. Givens, addressing novel questions about mandatory arbitration of attorney's fees in a case involving an Alaska Native allotment and federal government litigation.•Alaska Supreme Court addressed novel questions about mandatory arbitration of attorney's fee disputes on January 23, 2026•Case involved Alaska Native allotment heirs and successful federal government lawsuit over oil and gas mismanagementAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtJan 23, 2026•4 min readWyoming Supreme CourtWyoming Supreme Court Affirms Summary Judgment in Construction DisputeThe Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a district court's summary judgment ruling in favor of Big Horn Glass, Inc. against Sletten Construction of Wyoming, Inc. in a third-party liability dispute involving a firearms manufacturing facility construction project in Cody, Wyoming.•Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment favoring Big Horn Glass against Sletten Construction's third-party claims•Dispute arose from construction of firearms manufacturing facility for Gunwerks in Cody, WyomingAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtJan 23, 2026•4 min readWyoming Supreme CourtWyoming Supreme Court Affirms Drug Conviction Despite Search ChallengeThe Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed Chad Everette Urrutia's methamphetamine possession conviction, rejecting his argument that law enforcement omitted material facts from a search warrant affidavit. The court found no error in the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence found in his bedroom.•Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed methamphetamine possession conviction after rejecting search warrant challenge•Defendant argued law enforcement omitted material facts from warrant affidavit that would have undermined probable causeAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtJan 23, 2026•4 min readSupreme Court of IowaIowa Supreme Court Upholds COVID-19 Immunity Law in Nursing Home Death CaseThe Iowa Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the dismissal of wrongful death claims against Oakland Manor nursing facility, clarifying the scope of COVID-19 liability protections for healthcare providers. The ruling addresses the balance between facility immunity and patient safety during the pandemic.•Iowa Supreme Court unanimously affirmed dismissal of wrongful death claims against Oakland Manor nursing facility•Case provides first major interpretation of Iowa's COVID-19 Response and Back-to-Business Limited Liability ActAI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State CourtJan 23, 2026•4 min readCourt of Appeals of MarylandMaryland Supreme Court Reinstates Attorney Robert Paul Pratz to State BarThe Maryland Supreme Court granted attorney Robert Paul Pratz's petition for reinstatement to the Maryland Bar on Jan. 23, 2026. The order, signed by Chief Justice Matthew J. Fader, restores Pratz's ability to practice law in the state following a period of suspension or disbarment.•Robert Paul Pratz successfully petitioned the Maryland Supreme Court for reinstatement to the state bar•The court granted the petition on Jan. 23, 2026, with Chief Justice Matthew J. Fader signing the orderAI-generated SummaryRead Article →