TodayLegal News

Latest Legal News

Federal Circuit
5 min read
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

11th Circuit Upholds Felon Firearm Conviction Against Constitutional Challenge

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the conviction of Travion Cortez Vanhorn for possession of a firearm as a convicted felon under federal law. Vanhorn had challenged the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) both facially and as applied to his case, but the appellate court rejected his arguments.

Eleventh Circuit affirmed conviction under federal felon-in-possession statute 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)
Defendant challenged the law's constitutionality both facially and as applied to his specific case
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

6th Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Police Liability Case in Fatal Shooting

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit against Dayton police officers who responded to a domestic dispute shortly before a man fatally shot his partner and her daughter. The court upheld a lower court's ruling that res judicata barred the federal claims after a state court had previously dismissed similar allegations.

Sixth Circuit affirmed dismissal of federal lawsuit against Dayton police officers who responded to domestic dispute before fatal shooting
Aisha Nelson and six-year-old Harper Guynn were killed by Waverly Hawes an hour after police left without arresting him despite threats
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Second Circuit Court of Appeals

2nd Circuit Affirms District Court in Lim v. Radish Media Case

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a lower court's judgment in *Jun Young Lim v. Radish Media, Inc.* in a summary order issued Feb. 5, 2026. The non-precedential ruling concluded an employment dispute between Lim and the media company.

Second Circuit affirmed district court judgment favoring Radish Media, Inc.
Summary order carries no precedential effect under federal appellate rules
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals

7th Circuit Affirms Drug Conviction Despite Surveillance Challenge

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the drug trafficking conviction of Antonio Carrazco-Martinez, rejecting his Fourth Amendment challenge to government surveillance using cell-site simulators and hidden cameras. The February 5, 2026 decision addresses key questions about modern investigative technology in criminal cases.

Seventh Circuit affirmed drug trafficking conviction despite Fourth Amendment challenge to surveillance methods
Government used warrant-authorized cell-site simulators and hidden cameras to investigate Chicago-Mexico drug operation
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

9th Circuit Reverses Safety Valve Relief in Drug Sentencing Case

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court's decision granting safety valve relief to Paul Engstrom in a drug-related case, vacating his below-minimum sentence and remanding for resentencing.

Ninth Circuit reversed district court's safety valve relief determination for drug defendant Paul Engstrom
Engstrom failed to provide complete debrief to government as required by federal statute
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

4th Circuit Vacates Identity Theft Conviction in McDonald Fraud Case

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated Jennifer McDonald's aggravated identity theft conviction while affirming her 30 fraud-related convictions. The court ruled the identity theft did not occur 'during and in relation to' predicate offenses under Supreme Court precedent.

Fourth Circuit vacated aggravated identity theft conviction but affirmed 30 fraud-related convictions
Court applied Supreme Court's Dubin v. United States precedent requiring identity theft occur 'during and in relation to' predicate offenses
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Third Circuit Court of Appeals

3rd Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Virgin Islands Excise Tax Refund Claims

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the dismissal of consolidated lawsuits by six construction and trading companies seeking excise tax refunds from the U.S. Virgin Islands. The companies challenged a territorial statute requiring excise taxes on goods brought into the Virgin Islands.

Six companies lost their consolidated appeal seeking excise tax refunds from the U.S. Virgin Islands
Third Circuit affirmed district court dismissal of lawsuits challenging territorial excise tax statute
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
4 min read
Idaho Supreme Court

Idaho Supreme Court Denies Writ of Prohibition Against Tax Commission

The Idaho Supreme Court denied a petition for writ of prohibition filed by education groups and advocacy organizations challenging the Idaho State Tax Commission's authority. The coalition of petitioners, including the Idaho Education Association and school districts, sought to limit the commission's powers through constitutional protections.

Idaho Supreme Court denied writ of prohibition against State Tax Commission
Coalition included education groups, school districts, parents, and constitutional advocacy organizations
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
First Circuit Court of Appeals

First Circuit Rules on Website Jurisdiction in Gun Marketplace Case

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit addressed whether online gun marketplace Armslist, LLC can be subject to personal jurisdiction in New Hampshire based on its website operations. The case involves former Boston police officer Kurt Stokinger and his wife suing the Pennsylvania-based company over a 2016 shooting.

First Circuit addressed personal jurisdiction over Pennsylvania-based gun marketplace Armslist in case brought by former Boston police officer
Case involves 2015 New Hampshire gun sale allegedly facilitated by website that led to 2016 Boston shooting
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Second Circuit Court of Appeals

2nd Circuit Affirms Rabobank Medical Plan Win in ERISA Benefits Case

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a lower court's summary judgment ruling in favor of Rabobank Medical Plan in a dispute with the estate of a deceased plan participant. The case involved executor Sheri Savage challenging the medical plan's decisions regarding benefits for her deceased sister Cindy Sieden.

Second Circuit affirmed summary judgment in favor of Rabobank Medical Plan in ERISA benefits dispute
Estate executor Sheri Savage challenged the plan's decisions regarding her deceased sister's benefits
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →