TodayLegal News

Latest Legal News

State Court
4 min read
Idaho Supreme Court

Idaho Supreme Court Affirms Life Sentences in Child Sexual Abuse Case

The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and life sentences of Todd Marshall Frandsen, who was found guilty in 2023 of two counts of lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen. The court issued an amended opinion on January 7, 2026, upholding the district court's judgment and rejecting Frandsen's appeal.

Frandsen received two concurrent life sentences with 20-year fixed terms following his 2023 conviction
The Idaho Supreme Court rejected four main arguments raised in Frandsen's appeal
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

10th Circuit Affirms Sexual Abuse Sentence Enhancement

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed a sentence enhancement for Leo Steban Chumwalooky, who pled guilty to sexual abuse of a minor in Indian Country. The appellate court upheld the district court's finding that Chumwalooky had supervisory control over the victim.

Leo Steban Chumwalooky pled guilty to Sexual Abuse of a Minor in Indian Country under federal jurisdiction
District court applied sentence enhancement for supervisory control over victim under U.S.S.G. § 2A3.2(b)(1)
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

11th Circuit Vacates Sentence in $2M Credit Card Fraud Case

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit vacated the sentence of Abdoulaye Barry, who was convicted in a sophisticated credit card fraud scheme that netted over $2 million in cigarette purchases from Sam's Club. The appeals court ruled that the district court erred by holding Barry accountable for the full amount charged by all co-conspirators without first determining his individual responsibility.

Eleventh Circuit vacated Barry's sentence for legal error in accountability determination
Fraud scheme used stolen credit cards and shared Sam's Club memberships to buy $2M in cigarettes
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

11th Circuit Upholds Maritime Drug Trafficking Conviction

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the conviction of Ronald Mijail Arregoces Barros for conspiracy to possess five kilograms or more of cocaine aboard a vessel under U.S. jurisdiction. The January 7, 2026 ruling upholds the Southern District of Florida's original conviction in this high-seas drug trafficking case.

Eleventh Circuit affirmed conviction for conspiracy to possess 5+ kilograms of cocaine on vessel under U.S. jurisdiction
Defendant challenged government authority under Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act in foreign Exclusive Economic Zones
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Third Circuit Court of Appeals

3rd Circuit Affirms Gun Conviction, Rejects 2nd Amendment Challenge

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed Dijuan Taylor's federal firearms conviction, rejecting his constitutional challenge to the federal gun possession statute. Taylor had argued that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violated his Second Amendment rights both facially and as applied to his case.

Third Circuit affirmed Dijuan Taylor's federal firearms conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)
Court rejected Taylor's Second Amendment challenges, citing binding precedent from previous cases
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Third Circuit Affirms USCIS Denial of Naturalization for Diversity Visa Recipient

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling that upheld USCIS's denial of naturalization for Ousmane Savane, a permanent resident since 2012 who entered through the Diversity Visa Program. The court found that material omissions on his initial immigrant visa application warranted the denial.

Third Circuit affirmed USCIS denial of naturalization for permanent resident who made material omissions on original diversity visa application
Court rejected appellant's argument that omissions were immaterial, upholding government's authority to deny citizenship based on prior application discrepancies
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Second Circuit Court of Appeals

2nd Circuit Upholds FBAR Penalties Against Couple for Foreign Account

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed civil penalties against Juan and Catherine Reyes for failing to report their foreign bank account holdings. The January 2026 decision upholds summary judgment enforcing penalties under federal banking disclosure laws.

Second Circuit affirmed civil penalties against couple for failing to file required foreign bank account reports
Court held that 'willful' FBAR violations include reckless conduct, not just intentional violations
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
Federal Circuit
4 min read
Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Second Circuit Issues Summary Order in Mohamed v. Bondi Immigration Case

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a summary order on January 7, 2026, in the immigration case Ali Abdou Mohamed v. Pamela Bondi. The three-judge panel addressed a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision, though the full details of the court's ruling were not disclosed in the available documentation.

Second Circuit issued summary order in Ali Abdou Mohamed v. Pamela Bondi immigration case on January 7, 2026
Three-judge panel included Circuit Judges Richard J. Sullivan, William J. Nardini, and Eunice C. Lee
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
4 min read
Supreme Court of South Dakota

South Dakota Supreme Court Rules on Estate Undue Influence Claim

The South Dakota Supreme Court addressed a family estate dispute involving allegations that James Anthony O'Neill unduly influenced his mother's will to disinherit his siblings. The case centers on procedural issues regarding the use of prior court findings in probate proceedings.

Tony O'Neill petitioned to probate his mother's will that left him everything and disinherited his siblings
Siblings objected claiming the will was product of undue influence by Tony
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →
State Court
4 min read
Wyoming Supreme Court

Wyoming Supreme Court Affirms 120-Year Sentence for Child Sex Abuse

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a district court's decision to impose eight consecutive prison sentences totaling up to 120 years for Kyle Xavier Wallentine, who pleaded no contest to sexual abuse of a minor charges. The court rejected his pro se appeal after appointed counsel withdrew under the Anders procedure.

Kyle Xavier Wallentine received eight consecutive sentences of 8-15 years each for sexual abuse of a minor, totaling up to 120 years in prison
His court-appointed appellate counsel withdrew under the Anders v. California procedure, indicating no meritorious grounds for appeal
AI-generated SummaryRead Article →