TodayLegal News

Pa. Supreme Court Dismisses Environmental Regulation Appeals as Moot

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed multiple consolidated appeals challenging the state's environmental regulation process on January 6, 2026, after the Department of Environmental Protection and Legislative Reference Bureau resolved their dispute. The cases, which had drawn intervention requests from energy companies including Constellation Energy, were ruled moot following regulatory changes.

AI-generated Summary
2 min readcourtlistener
Seal of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Case Information

Case No.:
J-33E-2025

Key Takeaways

  • Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed consolidated environmental regulation appeals as moot on January 6, 2026
  • Cases between DEP and Legislative Reference Bureau were resolved through regulatory changes before Supreme Court decision
  • Energy companies including Constellation Energy had sought intervention but later applied to discontinue appeals
  • Dispute originally centered on regulatory authority between DEP, Environmental Quality Board, and Legislative Reference Bureau
  • Cases remanded to Commonwealth Court following dismissal, concluding the high-profile regulatory dispute

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has dismissed a complex environmental regulation dispute as moot, concluding consolidated cases that had pitted the Department of Environmental Protection against the Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau and drawn significant industry attention.

On January 6, 2026, the Supreme Court dismissed appeals numbered J-33E-2025 through J-33H-2025, which stemmed from Commonwealth Court orders dated June 28, 2022. The primary case involved Jessica Shirley, the interim acting secretary of the Department of Environmental Protection and interim acting chairperson of the Environmental Quality Board, challenging decisions by the Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau and its officials.

The original dispute centered on the authority and procedures surrounding environmental regulation implementation in Pennsylvania. The Legislative Reference Bureau had challenged certain environmental regulations, leading to a complex legal battle over regulatory authority between multiple state agencies.

Several major energy companies, including Constellation Energy, had initially sought to intervene in the proceedings, highlighting the significant industry implications of the regulatory dispute. However, as the case progressed, some parties, including Constellation, applied to discontinue their appeals as the underlying regulatory issues were resolved.

The cases were submitted to the Supreme Court on May 13, 2025, but became moot before a final decision could be rendered. In legal terms, a case is dismissed as 'moot' when the underlying dispute has been resolved or circumstances have changed such that the court can no longer provide meaningful relief to the parties.

The dismissal indicates that the Department of Environmental Protection and Legislative Reference Bureau were able to resolve their regulatory authority dispute through administrative or legislative means, eliminating the need for judicial intervention. This outcome allows the environmental regulation process to continue under the resolved framework without further court oversight.

Following the dismissal, the cases have been remanded to the Commonwealth Court, formally concluding the Supreme Court proceedings that had been closely watched by environmental law practitioners and industry stakeholders throughout Pennsylvania.

Topics

Environmental ProtectionAdministrative LawEnergy IndustryLabor RelationsState Government

Original Source: courtlistener

This AI-generated summary is based on publicly available legal news, court documents, legislation, regulatory filings, and legal developments. For informational purposes only; not legal advice. Read full disclosure →