TodayLegal News

ND Supreme Court Modifies Trust Property Partition Award

The North Dakota Supreme Court affirmed but modified a district court judgment in a property partition case between Bryan Tischmak and the Tischmak Family Irrevocable Trust. The court awarded Tischmak an additional $2,417.20 by excluding trust expenses from his share of property costs.

AI-generated Summary
2 min readcourtlistener
Seal of the North Dakota Supreme Court

Case Information

Case No.:
2025 ND 235
Judges:
Tufte, Jerod E.

Key Takeaways

  • North Dakota Supreme Court affirmed but modified district court judgment in family property partition case
  • Bryan Tischmak awarded additional $2,417.20 by excluding trust expenses from his share of costs
  • Dispute involved extensive family farmland in Grant County owned by Tischmak family for decades
  • Case establishes precedent for handling trust expenses in property partition calculations

The North Dakota Supreme Court has modified a district court judgment in *Tischmak v. Theurer*, a property partition case involving family land in Grant County. The high court affirmed the lower court's decision but awarded plaintiff Bryan Tischmak an additional $2,417.20 in the settlement.

In an opinion authored by Justice Tufte, the court held that trust expenses should be excluded from Bryan Tischmak's share of property costs in the partition of family real estate. The case involved a dispute between Bryan Tischmak and the Tischmak Family Irrevocable Trust, established September 1, 2016, with Sondra F. Theurer and Allen R. Tischmak serving as co-trustees.

The property at the center of the dispute consists of extensive farmland in Grant County that the Tischmak family had owned for decades. The land includes multiple sections spanning two townships, comprising surface interests in Township 131 North, Range 84 West, and Township 132 North, Range 84 West of the 5th Principal Meridian.

The five Tischmak siblings—Janice, Kenneth, Allen, Bryan, and Sondra—were raised on this family land. The partition action arose from disagreements over the management and ownership structure of the property following the establishment of the family trust.

The Supreme Court's modification specifically addressed how trust-related expenses should be allocated in partition proceedings, establishing that such costs should not burden individual beneficiaries' shares when calculating final distributions. This ruling provides important guidance for future cases involving family trusts and property partitions in North Dakota.

Topics

real estatefamily trustproperty partitioninheritanceland rightstenant in common

Original Source: courtlistener

This AI-generated summary is based on publicly available legal news, court documents, legislation, regulatory filings, and legal developments. For informational purposes only; not legal advice. Read full disclosure →