TodayLegal News

Hawaii Supreme Court Rules on Hawaiian Electric Liability in Lahaina Fire

The Hawaii Supreme Court issued a ruling on February 10, 2026, in a complex liability case involving Hawaiian Electric Company and the devastating August 8, 2023 Lahaina fire that killed over 100 people. Insurance companies are appealing a lower court decision in litigation stemming from the deadliest wildfire in modern U.S. history.

AI-generated Summary
1 min readcourtlistener
Seal of the Supreme Court of Hawaii

Case Information

Case No.:
SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX

Key Takeaways

  • Hawaii Supreme Court ruled on Hawaiian Electric's liability for the August 8, 2023 Lahaina fire that killed over 100 people
  • Insurance companies are appealing a circuit court decision seeking subrogation rights in the complex wildfire litigation
  • The case involves multiple defendants including Hawaiian Electric, Kamehameha Schools, State of Hawaii, and Maui County

The Hawaii Supreme Court ruled Monday on Hawaiian Electric Company's liability in litigation stemming from the catastrophic Lahaina fire of August 8, 2023, that devastated the former capital of the Hawaiian Kingdom and killed more than 100 people.

The case, *Burnes v. Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.*, involves Nova Burnes and other plaintiffs who sued Hawaiian Electric, along with Kamehameha Schools, the State of Hawaii, and Maui County following the deadly wildfire. ACE American Insurance Company and other insurance companies intervened as subrogation plaintiffs and are now appealing a circuit court decision.

Justice Eddins authored the court's opinion in the case, which was decided by Acting Chief Justice McKenna, Justice Eddins, and Justice Ginoza. Circuit Judge Morikone served in place of Justice Devens, who was recused, and Circuit Judge Tomasa was assigned due to a vacancy on the court.

The August 8, 2023 fire marked one of the most devastating natural disasters in Hawaii's modern history. The blaze destroyed hundreds of properties and historic sites in Lahaina, forcing businesses to close and leaving thousands of residents displaced. The fire's rapid spread through the historic town raised questions about utility company responsibilities and emergency response protocols during extreme weather conditions.

Topics

wildfire litigationclass action settlementpersonal injuryproperty damagepublic utilities liability

Original Source: courtlistener

This AI-generated summary is based on publicly available legal news, court documents, legislation, regulatory filings, and legal developments. For informational purposes only; not legal advice. Read full disclosure →