TodayLegal News

Arkansas Supreme Court Dismisses Gun Shop Appeal Without Prejudice

The Arkansas Supreme Court dismissed without prejudice an appeal by Eureka Gun and Pawn, LLC and Keeling Grubb challenging the City of Eureka Springs over a conditional-use permit denial. The court ruled it lacked jurisdiction due to the absence of a final order from the circuit court.

AI-generated Summary
2 min readcourtlistener
Seal of the Arkansas Supreme Court

Case Information

Case No.:
CV-24-604

Key Takeaways

  • Arkansas Supreme Court dismissed the appeal without prejudice for lack of final order
  • Dispute involved Eureka Gun and Pawn's challenge to conditional-use permit denial
  • Appellants argued circuit court should have conducted de novo review instead of deferring to city council
  • Gun shop owners raised constitutional and statutory interpretation challenges
  • Case can be re-filed once circuit court issues final judgment

The Arkansas Supreme Court dismissed without prejudice an appeal by Eureka Gun and Pawn, LLC and its president Keeling Grubb against the City of Eureka Springs on Jan. 15, 2026, ruling the case lacked a final appealable order.

The dispute centered on Grubb's attempt to obtain a conditional-use permit to operate his sporting goods store as a gun and pawn shop in Eureka Springs, Arkansas. Grubb submitted the permit application on behalf of Eureka Gun on May 8, 2023.

The Carroll County Circuit Court granted a directed verdict motion filed by the City of Eureka Springs through orders dated May 16 and May 31, 2024. However, the Arkansas Supreme Court determined these orders did not constitute a final judgment necessary for appellate review.

In their appeal, the gun shop owners raised five substantive arguments challenging the circuit court's handling of their case. They contended the circuit court erred by deferring to the Eureka Springs City Council's decision rather than conducting an independent review of the permit application.

The appellants argued the circuit court should have applied a de novo standard of review when examining the city's denial of their conditional-use permit. They also raised constitutional challenges and statutory interpretation issues regarding the permit process.

The Arkansas Supreme Court's dismissal without prejudice means the appellants can refile their appeal once the circuit court issues a final judgment in the case. This procedural dismissal does not address the merits of the underlying dispute over the conditional-use permit denial.

Topics

firearms regulationconditional use permitmunicipal lawconstitutional lawadministrative appealdirected verdict

Original Source: courtlistener

This AI-generated summary is based on publicly available legal news, court documents, legislation, regulatory filings, and legal developments. For informational purposes only; not legal advice. Read full disclosure →