TodayLegal News

5th Circuit Revives Antitrust Claims Against Caremark PBM Network

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals partially reversed a lower court's dismissal of antitrust claims by Rx Solutions against Caremark LLC and CVS Pharmacy Inc. The appeals court affirmed the dismissal of federal antitrust claims but found diversity jurisdiction exists for state law claims.

AI-generated Summary
2 min readcourtlistener
Seal of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Information

Case No.:
25-60084

Key Takeaways

  • Fifth Circuit affirmed dismissal of federal antitrust claims but reversed district court's diversity jurisdiction finding
  • Rx Solutions can proceed with two of three state law claims against Caremark and CVS Pharmacy
  • Case involves independent pharmacy challenging PBM network denial practices
  • District court will hear remaining state law claims on remand

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a mixed ruling Tuesday in an antitrust case involving pharmacy benefit management network access, partially reversing a district court's dismissal while affirming other aspects of the lower court's decision.

In *Rx Solutions, Inc. v. Caremark, L.L.C.*, the appeals court affirmed the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi's dismissal of federal antitrust claims but reversed the district court's finding that it lacked diversity jurisdiction over remaining state law claims.

The case stems from Caremark LLC's denial of Rx Solutions Inc.'s application to join Caremark's pharmacy benefit management network. Rx Solutions, a retail pharmacy in Mississippi owned equally by brothers Logan Cain and Evan Cain and operated by CEO Louis Bond, filed suit against both Caremark and CVS Pharmacy Inc.

Circuit Judge Cory T. Wilson, writing for a three-judge panel that included Judges Southwick and Higginson, explained that Rx Solutions had brought "two federal antitrust claims and three state law claims" following the network denial.

The district court had originally dismissed the federal antitrust claims and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims, ruling it lacked diversity jurisdiction. However, the Fifth Circuit determined that complete diversity of citizenship existed between the parties, allowing the federal court to hear the state law claims under diversity jurisdiction.

The appeals court remanded the case to the district court with instructions to consider the merits of the remaining state law claims. The ruling represents a significant development for independent pharmacies challenging exclusion from major PBM networks, as it provides a pathway for state-based antitrust and business tort claims to proceed in federal court when diversity jurisdiction requirements are met.

Topics

antitrustpharmacy benefit managementnetwork access denialfederal appealsdiversity jurisdiction

Original Source: courtlistener

This AI-generated summary is based on publicly available legal news, court documents, legislation, regulatory filings, and legal developments. For informational purposes only; not legal advice. Read full disclosure →