TodayLegal News

4th Circuit Affirms WARN Act Victory Against Mining Companies

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit unanimously affirmed a jury verdict finding five West Virginia coal mining companies liable under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act for failing to provide proper notice before terminating employees. The January 2, 2026 decision upholds workers' rights protections in a class action lawsuit led by Jules Gautier.

AI-generated Summary
2 min readcourtlistener
Seal of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Information

Case No.:
24-1401

Key Takeaways

  • Fourth Circuit unanimously affirmed jury verdict against five coal mining companies for WARN Act violations
  • Companies failed to provide required 60-day notice before terminating employees in West Virginia
  • Court upheld findings that companies constituted single employer and jury instructions were proper
  • Class action lawsuit potentially affects numerous mining workers and strengthens federal employment protections

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has affirmed a significant workers' rights victory against five coal mining companies that failed to provide legally required notice before mass layoffs. In *Jules Gautier v. Tams Management, Inc.* (4th Cir. 2026), a three-judge panel unanimously upheld a jury verdict finding the companies liable under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act.

Chief Judge Diaz wrote the opinion for the court, with Judges Thacker and Rushing joining. The January 2, 2026 decision affirmed the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia's denial of the companies' post-trial motions for judgment as a matter of law and a new trial.

The case centers on violations of the WARN Act, a federal law that requires certain employers to provide advance notice to employees before sudden, significant employment losses. The jury found the five mining companies liable for terminating workers without providing the statutorily required 60-day notice period.

The companies challenged several aspects of the lower court's ruling, including the determination that they constituted a 'single employer' under the WARN Act and the jury instructions provided during trial. The Fourth Circuit rejected these challenges, finding that sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict.

This decision reinforces the importance of WARN Act compliance in the mining industry and provides workers with enhanced protections against sudden job losses. The ruling may have broader implications for how courts interpret single employer relationships in future WARN Act cases.

Topics

Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification ActWARN ActMass layoffsEmployment terminationMining industryClass action lawsuit

Original Source: courtlistener

This AI-generated summary is based on publicly available legal news, court documents, legislation, regulatory filings, and legal developments. For informational purposes only; not legal advice. Read full disclosure →